4th Gen Tacoma Forum banner

Will You Miss The Tacoma's Rear Drum Brakes?

697 Views 8 Replies 3 Participants Last post by  TacoGuy
Wheel Tire Vehicle Automotive tire Motor vehicle


From the recent teaser photos of the Tacoma, it's clear that Toyota will finally be moving away from rear drum brakes and going with rear disc brakes.

I'm very happy they're finally doing this, it's nice to finally get upgraded brakes for added safety. But is anyone going to miss them? Or is everyone glad this is happening?
See less See more
1 - 9 of 9 Posts
I am glad that Toyota is finally moving the Taco to rear discs, and I don't see any downsides. My 2011 Tundra has rear discs and seems to stop better than my last Tacoma did.

The Tundra has had them since 2007 and it seems like time to bring the Taco up to date with the rest of the truck world.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I am glad that Toyota is finally moving the Taco to read discs, and I don't see any downsides. My 2011 Tundra has rear discs and seems to stop better than my last Tacoma did.

The Tundra has had them since 2007 and it seems like time to bring the Taco up to date with the rest of the truck world.
Yeah I completely agree it's a long overdue change. It's not like disc brakes are breaking new tech haha.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
This is probably hard to measure, but I suspect that servicing costs will be higher for the folks how mostly haul air in their beds. Rear brakes do so much less work than the fronts, especially in nose-heavy vehicles, that having drums sealed away from the elements probably last longer in use-cases where the extra stopping power of discs isn't needed.
For anyone using their truck to do truck things though, this seems like a big win.
For anyone using their truck to do truck things though, this seems like a big win.
I haven't seen any differences in durability between the two brake types, but that is an interesting point.

Unlike most of today's truck buyers I actually use mine, so this will definitely be a big win for me.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
This is probably hard to measure, but I suspect that servicing costs will be higher for the folks how mostly haul air in their beds. Rear brakes do so much less work than the fronts, especially in nose-heavy vehicles, that having drums sealed away from the elements probably last longer in use-cases where the extra stopping power of discs isn't needed.
For anyone using their truck to do truck things though, this seems like a big win.
On the flip side though for servicing costs, how many people know how to service drum brakes these days?
  • Haha
Reactions: 1
I haven't seen any differences in durability between the two brake types, but that is an interesting point.
I've noticed VW has made a point of putting drums on the back of its EVs, making the argument that so much of the braking is done by motor regeneration that the rears tend to get very little use (on EVs generally) and accumulate surface rust -- which isn't great when you eventually need to stop quickly.
It's hard to verify because most other EVs have aero covers on their wheels, and I don't make a point of inspecting random strangers brakes, but I think it's an interesting point that maybe (but probably not) has some corollary in the world of trucks that live pampered lives.
Interesting point about EVs, which have even less need for rear braking.

I also think car companies still use them when they can because they cost less than disc brakes. My wife's current fav is the Genesis GV60 EV, which is pretty premium and has four wheel disc brakes.
Interesting point about EVs, which have even less need for rear braking.

I also think car companies still use them when they can because they cost less than disc brakes. My wife's current fav is the Genesis GV60 EV, which is pretty premium and has four wheel disc brakes.
Volkswagen's ID.4 has rear drum brakes. VW says it's because the drums help decrease rolling resistance, along with the strength of the regen braking.


But Volkswagen isn't the sort of engineering company that assembles its cars with parts from Home Depot, so there's a good reason why it's doing this. Our guess here at The Drive was that the rear wheels get enough braking from the regen system, so they don't need discs. Since the motors are mounted at the back—the ID.4 is indeed rear-wheel-drive—they provide direct braking power to the rear axle. We thought Volkswagen likely figured that to save some upfront cost and make maintenance intervals a bit longer, it would opt for drums instead of discs. After all, cost is still a huge barrier to EV ownership.

However, a VW spokesman tells us that they used rear drums on the ID.4 primarily to decrease rolling resistance, as disc brake pads have the tendency to drag on the rotors a small amount as the car coasts. Drum brakes, just by nature of their design, do not. The brand also says that drum brakes offer superior performance and reactivity after long periods of disuse—those long inactive periods being due to the EV's regenerative braking system handling most of the stopping.

So while many may have assumed that Volkswagen was just looking for one more area to chip away at the price, they were actually searching for avenues to get every last drop of range out of the ID.4's battery pack. And we're cool with that.
See less See more
1 - 9 of 9 Posts
Top